Is patikula manasikara (contemplation of foulness) a type of
meditation dealing with repulsiveness?
Question:
Venerable Sir, our understanding with regard to the patikula manasikara in the kayanupassana
section of the Satipatthana Sutta is
the process of contemplating the repulsiveness of the 32 body parts. However, a
common glimpse at our body parts does not cause any disappointment or disgust
in us. Therefore, I believe that the Buddha had given some specific meaning to
“patikkula manasikara”. Venerable
Sir, what is really meant by patikkula
manasikara? Also, please clarify “patikkula
manasikara” in relation to ahara
(nutriment) as well.
Answer: You need to remember that we are always
struggling with our lives due to self-centred expectations. When caught up with
self-centred expectations, defilements are bound to emerge in the mind.
Whenever the mind operates without self-centered expectations, defilements do
not have any impact on the mind. This doesn’t mean a complete absence of defilements,
but a state where the defilements remain suppressed, dormant in the mind. The
mind does not have any dealings with these defilements.
What is our
primary expectation in our day to day life? We expect to seek happiness
throughout our lives. We expect to lead a happy life without experiencing any
disorders, worries. For instance, we expect to be good-looking by having black
hair forever, wrinkle-free skin forever. In short, we expect our physique to be
in perfect condition so that we could continue to seek happiness as usual, all
the time. As long as one has this self-centred mentality, one is unable to get
rid of attachment. In the Satipattana
Sutta, the Buddha illustrated the way to get rid of attachment gradually.
In the section which deals with the patikula
mansikara (contemplation of foulness), the way to look at the 32 body parts
in relation to their real nature, origin has been pointed out. It is by no
means a way to look at the body parts and become disgusted about them. In the patikula mansikara section of the satipattana Sutta, it is mentioned that
the body, surrounded by skin from the sole of the feet to the crown of the
head, is full of impurities (imameva
kayam uddham padatala adho kesamatthaka tacapariyantam pura nanappakarassa
asucino pacca vekkati). We need to define the word “asuci” in the first place. The word “asuci” is not used to denote a disgustful essence even though it is
commonly believed so. In accordance with the Buddha’s teachings, the word “asuci” refers to a substance which has
transformed to a worthless state due to wear and tear. “suci” means something worthwhile.
The Buddha identified the body parts in this context and the term “asuci” should never be considered to
signify the body parts as filth, or waste material as it would create hateful,
malicious feelings in the mind. The Buddha used the term “paccavekkati” (reflection) to validate this point.
What is meant by
“reflection” (paccavekkati) in respect of the impurities indicated in the
section on patikula mansikara
(contemplation of foulness)? There are four types of reflection in the case of
a monk; pindapata (food); civara (robes) senasana (shelter); and gilanapaccaya
(medicine). If a monk recites a phrase verbally, incorporating these four types
of necessities, it could not be considered as a proper reflection (paccavekkati). What is the ultimate
meaning and expectation involved in this reflection? A monk would ideally reflect on the four
necessities in this manner.
“Defilements
have been a part and parcel of my mind from time immemorial; I need a
considerable period of time in order to abandon these defilements; I eat food
only for the purpose of abandoning my defilements and seeking mental solace; I
do not expect to be hale and hearty, and strong by consuming this food; neither
do I expect any enjoyment from the food; I wear my robes in order to be free
from extraneous obstacles such as heat and coldness; I use these necessities as
tools only for the purpose of calming down the mind”.
For instance,
when we get a headache, we take medicine as a cure. Why we need a cure? We
cannot focus on the practice of calming the mind when a headache bothers us.
Therefore, I resort to medicine only as a cure for my headache, but not for any
other purposes.
In accordance with
the Buddha’s teachings, our life is made up of the 32 body parts.
(Life means a
combination of body and mind). We are attached to our lives excessively. It is
very difficult for us to extricate ourselves from this excessive attachment to
life. The Buddha has taught us the way to extricate ourselves from this
excessive attachment gradually in the patikulamansikara
section of the Kayanupassana.
What is the
hidden cause related to the excessive attachment? It is the “ nandi raga” (passionate greed)?
If one is to extricate oneself from the nandiraga,
one has to go to the very end of the mental process.The Buddha has pointed out
the difficult task of eliminating the nandiraga
in the Vammika Sutta and nandiraga has been likened to a piece of
flesh in this sutta. This is where we
find the root cause for our self- centred mentality. With this explanation, the
correct practice of patikulamansikarat
must make sense to you.
What is
important at this stage is the clarity of mind. By now, a mediator has cultivated
a clear, unbiased mind through the practice prescribed in the “ sampajanna, iriyapata pabba, and
catusampajanna”. The mind maintains an unbiased, calm state which is devoid
of attachment and hostility. In other words, this is the state of Samadhi (concentration)
which gives rise to a clear vision. The meditator is able to view the truth,
depending on the degree of wisdom gained by Samadhi.
In section on patikula mansikara (contemplation of
foulness), the Buddha pointed out the way to be followed in association with
the 32 body parts. The body parts are categorised as insignificant impurities,
even though they assist our existence to some extent. We consume food in order to
sustain our lives. The food we consume turns to gaseous substance in the body
and this gaseous substance is absorbed by the organs of the body for sustenance
and growth. Once the gaseous substance is absorbed by the organs and body
parts, the rest is released out of the body from nine outlets. These impure
fluids are also considered as asuci
(impurities). This indicates that all the organs and body parts are also made
up of substances which could be identified as asuci (impurities).
Impurities are latently present in the body parts and the organs, according to
the Buddha’s teachings.
Some meditators
use drawings of organs such as hearts, kidneys, and bowels as their meditation
objects. We can not expect any consolation by observing external organs. One needs
to perform a self reflection in order to seek consolation. You may say that we
cannot truly observe our internal organs. Even though we cannot see our organs
with our naked eye, there are occasions where the existence of organs becomes
evident. Let’s assume, for example, you suffered a heart attack the other day.
At that time, the organ of heart becomes prominent to you. You go through a
stage of mental and physical suffering as a result of your heart attack. This
becomes a mental trauma which endangers your life.
What causes this
mental trauma? It is because of your intense attachment to your organs and body
parts. As we have been intrinsically attached to our organs and body parts for
such a long period of time, we find it very difficult to get rid of our
attachment and intrinsic attitude towards our body parts. With the discussion
we made so far, it could be deduced that the practice of patikula
mansikara is based and aimed at relaxing the intrinsic attachment to our
body parts.
The Buddha
taught the way of correct thinking to detach ourselves from the intrinsic,
inescapable attachment through the practice of
patikula mansikara. One has to
reflect on the 32 body parts in the same way as a monk practices “patikkula manasikara”
in relation to ahara (nutriment).
Accordingly, one needs reflect on the need of healthy body parts so long as one
achieves solace after dousing the fire of defilements. One should not seek any
pleasure out of these body parts, other than the need for soundness of body
parts until the attainment of tranquility after cessation of defilements. So,
one gains insight into the futility and worthlessness of body parts through the
practice patikula
mansikara.
If one suffers from a kidney ailment, for
instance, and a diagnosis reveals that both kidneys are malfunctioning. Now,
the kidney becomes an evident object to this individual. Even though one
expects to have a healthy, lasting kidney, it has now become a weak organ. What
is important for a meditator in this instance is to expect only the function of
a failing kidney. He needs to ponder that he has been caring for and nurturing
organs, including the kidney, which have the potential of causing severe pain. So,
he is prepared to accept any consequences, including death, that may result
from the kidney failure, while seeking treatment for the ailment. One who
practices patikula
mansikara begins
to think along these lines in respect of one’s body parts. This would lead to
the relief from attachment to the body parts. One begins to understand that one
is not in a position to sustain any body part without being subjected to
deceases. It is absurd to have an attachment or aversion towards the body parts
as these are prone to disease. The practice of
patikula
mansikara should
continue until the mind is convinced of this reality and the mind becomes
indifferent towards the natural functions of the body parts.
Now, we need to focus our attention to the patikula mansikara in relation to nutriment (ahara) as you requested a clarification
on that subject. Some have misunderstood the concept of patikula mansikara in relation to nutriment (ahara) and they tend to consume meals after mixing and blending all
the food items together. This is an erroneous practice resulting from
misrepresenting the term “ahara”
and following the conventional meaning
of the term “ahara”. It not advisable
to consume meals with a feeling of distaste or disgust as it lead to
indigestion or other health complecations. I f a person makes his meal an
detestable mass of mixture in order to reflect on foulness of nutriment, it is
an occasion where this person suffers a result of a bad kamma. This is contrary
to the correct practice of reflection on foulness regariding nutriment (ahara). The meaning of ahara is
“sustaining or prolonging existence”. Therefore, the practice of reflection on
foulness of nutriment (ahara) is a
mental investigation and a way of thinking directed at comprehending the
futility of prolonging the existence.
20.
Reflection
on Elements (Dhatu Manasikara) and Solidity (pathavi) in Mind
Question
: Venerable Sir, Reflection on Elements ( dhatu manasikara) is analysed after the
section on contemplation of foulness (patikula
mansikara) in the kayanupassana
(contemplation of body). Is there a specific reason for this? The most
significant clarification I seek from you is your assertion with regard to the
manifestation of solidity or earth element (pathavi)
associated with the mind. Also, your interpretation with regard to Patavi (Hardness, Solidity), Apo (Liquidity,
Binding or flowing nature), Thejo (Heat) and Vayo (Movement, air) seem contrary
to the conventional meaning given to the Primary Elemnts (maha bhuta). We would like to hear your version of the analysis
with regard to the Primary Elements in accordance with the Buddhist
teachings.
Answer: We proceed to Dhatu Manasikara after passing by many sections. The
mind has progressed to this serene stage from its gross, indisciplined,
agitated state within this period of practice. The mind manifests a
considerable degree of progress made from the section on “ resperation” (anapana pabba) upto the section on
Reflection of Elements (dhatu manasikara).
This progress demonstrates mind’s ability to withstand stress from
external sensory stimuli. In other
words, Satipathtana Sutta directs the way for the mind to descend a downslope
gradually. This literally means the degree to which the mind has calmed down
from its original state of heat. So, we need to understand that the mind
attains a state of Samadhi (concentration), resulting in a greater degree of tranquility,
when the meditation practice reaches the stage of Dhatu manasikara.
The Buddha elucidated dhatu manasikara as “Puna
caparaṃ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu imameva kāyaṃ yathāṭhitaṃ yathāpaṇihitaṃ dhātuso
paccavekkhati: ‘Atthi imasmiṃ kāye pathavīdhātu āpodhātu tejodhātu vāyodhātū’ ti”. ["…In this body, there is
the earth-element, the water-element, the fire-element and the air-element.]
There are a few sections in this verse
which need clear clarification for the benefit of our analysis. The first section
is “Yathatitham yathāpaṇihitaṃ”.
“Yathatitham means “the way a certain thing stands”.
“Yathapanihitham” means “how a certain thing is formed”, meaning whether
something is formed straight, crooked etc. For instance, hair is meant to stand
in a certain way and in a certain place (Yathatitham)
and the hair is formed in a flexible, soft manner (Yathapanihitham). We need to note the distinction between the way
something is formed and how it stands or exists. Similarly, we need to
understand the difference between dhatu
(elements) and dharma (phenomena).
Dhatu means an
entity which holds something. Dharma means what is being held. For
instance, when you take a cup of water, cup is the “dhatu”, wheras water is the “dharma”. Dhatu
carries a certain thing and dharma is
the thing that is being carried by dhatu.
Therefore, any investigation with regard “dhatu”
would naturally lead to the subject of “dharma”
as well.
You may think, for a moment, the necessity
to gain knowledge of these things, as our priority is to find a way to
extinguish our inherent suffering. You need to understand the importance of
comprehending these concepts well in order to reach the path of deliverance.
Especially, when we investigate the specifics on dhatu, details of Dharma
begin to emerge. From the section on the respiration (anapana sati) up
to the section on contemplation of foulness (patikula manasikara),the
meditator’s task is noting all the phenomena (dharma) that arise in the
mind and training to relinquish these phenomena. The only way for us to get
closer to nibbana is relinquishing phenomena (dharma) that arise
in our minds.
Interpretations that we commonly apply in
respect of the Four Primary Elements (maha bhuta) referred to in
the dhatu manasikara (reflection on elements) are as follows; Pathavi is
earth with hardness; Apo is water; Tejo is fire; Vayo is air. If we consider
the Four Primary Elements along these
lines, we are not in a position to make use of these elements for our benefit.
Also, we cannot utilize these elements from a Buddhist perspective for mental
development. The Buddha teaches a scientific approach with regard to the
functions of the mind in the section on dhatu mansikara. The Buddha has
analyzed this section based on the functional meaning of the Primary Elements.
In accordance with the Buddh’s analysis, Pathavi referes to hardness
(firmness, rigidity), Apo refers to softness (mildness,slackness), Tejo
refers to heat (temperature) and Vayo means movement ( kinetic energy,
vibration). It is stated that an Arahant is devoid of Vayo Element as an
Arahant’s mind is not moved by any phenomena. Our minds are moved at all times
due to the existence of kama ( sensual desire) in the mind. Kama,
which could also be identified as “ magnetic force” in terms of its
functioning, has no potential to move anything when it is rooted out. In view
of this, it is stated that the Vayo
element does not exist in an Arahant. An Arahant’s mind is unshakable
due to the absence of Vayo element.
The Buddha presented an analysis of the
mind. Here, the Buddha points out that each thought constitutes the functions
of the four primary elements, viz; pathavi,
apo, tejo and vayo. Misery arises as part and parcel of our thoughts. If
there is no thought process in us, misery, mental problems are not likely to
emerge. Therefore, an investigation of mind in terms of data manasikara is significant. This would lead us on the path to
the cessation of suffering. The primary requirement in this effort is the
practice of anapanasati. One is able
to analyze one’s mind in terms of dhatu manasikara, only if one has developed
one’s mental state to tranquility through the practice of anapanasati. One who
has not achieved the tranquil state as a result of anapanasati practice is
unable to proceed with this analysis effectively. Therefore, tranquil state
(Samadhi) is a prerequisite for an effective analysis of the dhatu manasiakara.
One who cultivates the reflection of the 32 body parts based on the tranquil mind
(mundane Samadhi), one begins to perceive another aspect with regard to the 32
body parts as the practice goes into a deeper level. Here, one begins to
witness the compostion of the 32 body parts with the four primary elements. One
begins to realize that body parts are nothing but an outcome of the functions
of the four primary elements, viz; pathavi,
apo, tejo and vayo. This explains why dhatu
manasikara ranks after the patikula
manasikara. As this practice advances to a higher degree, the mediatator
begins witness, not only the 32 body parts,but the thoughts are associated with
the respective functions of pathavi, apo,
tejo and vayo as well. This means that the meditator is capable of
witnessing the pathavi dhatu (element of hardness) in his mind. Before we go
into details on this subject, let’s take the body part of hair as an example to
understand the relationship between primary elements and this body part. How does a hair get its black texture and
other properties to sustain it? A concerted activity of the respective primary
elements draws a juicy substance into the core of the hair fiber to sustain the
texture and the properties of the hair. Once the juicy substance gets depleted
in the core of the hair, it becomes gray hair. Therefore, the four primary
elements are crucially responsible for
origination and decay of hair. When a hair is inspected externally, it is
possible to see the characteristics of the four primary elements. The stiffness found in a hair is the testimony for
hardness (pathavi); bendable due to the existence of soft quality (apo)
; continuous existence due to the presence of heat energy (tejo) ; draws
energy towards its core with the help of magnetic force present in the atoms (vayo).
Heat
present in a hair sustains its growth and continues existence. Magnetic energy
present in the heat energy shakes up the magnetic energy of peripheral
substances and draws nutriment towards the core of the hair. So, pathavi constricts or squeezes things together
tightly. Apo eases off or slacken the process
of total constricting or squeezing with one another. The process of
constricting on one hand and slackening on the other hand generates the heat
energy (tejo). This heat energy produces a
magnetic energy (vayo) which creates the force of
attraction. This is the force of attraction which is known as “kama” (sensuality). These four
functions of the primary elements take place at all times and at all places in
our lives. Dhatu
Manasikara is
the section which deals with the analysis of these functions of the primary
elements.
A
meditator who practices dhatu mansikara focuses his attention on his mind and he begins to perceive his mind
and thoughts. If the mediator’s attention shifts from the Samadhi state ( state
which the meditator perceives his meditation object of respiration) to another
sense object, then, he deviates from the state of “being aware” to a state of
“expecting something more” from an object. This expectation to find something
from an object makes the meditator and the object constrict, squeeze, compress
with each other. This is the quality of pathavi present in the mind. If I clarify this situation further, we can note,
when our attention is directed to fresh thoughts, we invariably attach to these
thoughts firmly. The mind is totally
engrossed in these thoughts. Thoughts are fastened to the new object. What is the cause behind this attachment, bond,
fastening? The cause is the expectation of pleasure, happiness. This
relationship is dependent on the degree
of pathavi (attachment, bond, fastening)
found in the mind at that particular occasion. If the relationship between an
object and the thoughts is intense, it is because the operation of the pathavi element in the mind is intense.
If the relationship between an object and the thoughts is mild, it is due to
the mild operation of the pathavi element in the mind.
What
does the apo element have to do with the
intense or mild operation of pathavi
element? In the case of the mild operation of pathavi element, apo
plays a role of limiting the access, freedom for pathavi element to unleash its full force towards the object. Otherwise, there
is no presence of water in terms of the interpretation given to the element of apo and the common belief among us.
This is the main reason, as I mentioned before, why we cannot analyze the
operation of the four primary elements based on the conventional meaning
attributed to them. Mind establishes relationship with objects (pathavi function) depending on the
availability or non-availability of freedom (apo function) for that relationship. The resultant connection creates Tejo (element of heat) in the mind.
In other words, varying degrees of heat arises in the mind, depending on the
degree of relationship established as a result of the operation of pathavi and apo elements. As the degree of heat rises in the mind during the course
the mind makes a relationship with an
object through the operation of tejo
and vayo elements, a magnetic force is generated accordingly. This is the force
which has the potential of vibrating peripheral substances. We find this
magnetic energy all over a physical body. As the degree of heat (in mind)
rises, the intensity of the magnetic force in the physical body also rises.
This magnetic force is known as the element of apo.
I
believe that you had a fair understanding on the opereation of primary elements
in a mind. I could elaborate more on this using another example. Let’s take an
individual who practices meditation. Supposing, someone visits him at the time
of meditating, he would get angry and consider this incident to be an
obstruction to his meditation practice. He would resist, thinking, “ outsiders always gets in my way. It is very
difficult to practice meditation with undue presence of outsiders…”. Why does
get infuriated at this obstruction? His mind has overly embraced his meditation
practice; he has excessively attached to the practice; he has locked himself in
the practice. In other words, the operation of pathavi element in his
mind is so intense. The mind has provided free access (operation of apo)
for thoughts to be locked with the obstruction to meditation practice.. Due to
this freedom present in the mind (operation of apo), thoughts could
easily get locked, compressed (operation of pathavi) with the
obstruction. As a result of the operation of pathavi element followed by
the free access accommodated by the apo element, heat (tejo)
begins to rise to a higher degree in the mind. The resultant intense degree of
heat generates a similar degree of magnetic energy (kama) in the mind.
The higher the degree of heat, the higher the degree of magnetic energy in the
mind. The magnetic energy generated in this manner has the potential of making
vibrations, movements (in other atoms). As magnetic energy, with the potential
of making vibrations, is incorporated and carried in these elements, they are
identified as “elements of vayo” (vayo dhatu). I believe that you realize the
functioning of the four primary
elements, beginning with pathavi dhatu, in the mind.
Even
though, we analyze the process of the primary elements with gross examples,
when dhatu manasikara (reflection of elements) is practiced in a
practical way, a mediatator needs to have developed a stable mental state where
he could perceive his respiration very clearly. In other words, the meditator
needs a strong Samadhi (concentration) to accomplish the practice of dhatu
manasikara. The meditator who contemplates the mental phenomena with a
strong mindfulness based on the Samadhi, would perceive the changes in the mind
on the basis of dhatu manasikara. Accordingly, the meditator perceives
two types of consciousness within the mind. First is the conciousness produced
as a result of amplification of pathavi
effect. Second is the consciousness produced by diminishing effect of pathavi
element. The mediator keeps identifying and analyzing these two types of
consciousness during the course of the dhatu manasikara practice. Now,
this is his primary aspect of meditation. The meditator who experinces a
blissful mental state, now, begins to catch the first glimpse of the transient
nature (anicca) of the mind. He begins to observe the changes that take
place even in the blissful mental states. He perceives slight differences of
bliss he experiences during Samadhi states which give rise to the understanding
of the characteristic of dhukka ( altering the current state and
transforming to a different state) inherent even in blissful mental states.
Thus, a meditator begins to realize, for the first time,the characteristics of anicca
(impermenance), dukkha (alter & transform nature) and anatta
(no-self) through the reflection of one’s mind. This is the positive outcome,
gain that a meditator achieves through the practice of dhatu manasikara.
Mere discussions aimed at the characteristics of anicca, dukkha and anatta or
reciting the nature of anicca ,dukkha, anatta would not bring any fruitful
benefits to an individual. One needs to realize the nature and characteristics
pertain to anicca, dukkha and anatta through a direct reflection of one’s mind
based on the meditation techniques prescribed by the Buddha. That is the only
approach for an individual to attain Nibbana.
Even
though, there are some more matters to be discussed under the subject matter of
dhatu manasikara, I have only elaborated matters to suit your question in this
regard. In summing up, the approach pertaining to the dhatu manasikara practice
is to enable practitioners to deviate from the conventional way of thinking and
proceed towards a new thinking pattern
which is free from causing suffering.
No comments:
Post a Comment